Lab 04: Azure Firewall¶

Deploy Azure Firewall with a simple spoke subnet, force egress through the firewall using a route table, and validate both allowed and denied traffic so teams can learn how routing and firewall policy interact in practice.

Lab Metadata¶

Prerequisites¶

• Permission to create Azure Firewall, public IPs, route tables, and a test VM.
• A workspace ID if you want to stream logs to Log Analytics during the lab.
• A resource group such as $RG=rg-net-lab04 and location such as $LOCATION=koreacentral.
• Budget awareness: Azure Firewall incurs hourly and data-processing charges. Tear down promptly after the lab.

Architecture Diagram¶

mermaid flowchart LR Workload[Spoke VM] --> UDR[Route Table 0.0.0.0/0] UDR --> Firewall[Azure Firewall] Firewall --> Internet[Internet] Firewall --> Logs[Firewall logs] Ops[Operator] --> Firewall

Step-by-Step Instructions¶

Step 1: Create the VNet, subnets, and public IP¶

az group create \
    --name $RG \
    --location $LOCATION

az network vnet create \
    --resource-group $RG \
    --name vnet-fw-lab04 \
    --location $LOCATION \
    --address-prefixes 10.140.0.0/16 \
    --subnet-name AzureFirewallSubnet \
    --subnet-prefixes 10.140.1.0/24

az network vnet subnet create \
    --resource-group $RG \
    --vnet-name vnet-fw-lab04 \
    --name workload \
    --address-prefixes 10.140.2.0/24

az network public-ip create \
    --resource-group $RG \
    --name pip-fw04 \
    --sku Standard \
    --allocation-method Static

This layout mirrors the minimum production pattern of firewall plus workload subnet.

Why this step matters¶

• It establishes an observable checkpoint for the lab before you continue.
• It mirrors a real production activity that often appears in troubleshooting tickets.
• Save command output and timestamps so you can compare expected versus actual behavior later.

Step 2: Create the firewall and firewall policy¶

az network firewall policy create \
    --resource-group $RG \
    --name fwp-lab04 \
    --location $LOCATION

az network firewall create \
    --resource-group $RG \
    --name fw-lab04 \
    --location $LOCATION \
    --firewall-policy fwp-lab04

az network firewall ip-config create \
    --resource-group $RG \
    --firewall-name fw-lab04 \
    --name fwconfig \
    --public-ip-address pip-fw04 \
    --vnet-name vnet-fw-lab04

Wait for provisioning to finish before moving on. Firewall deployment can take several minutes.

Why this step matters¶

• It establishes an observable checkpoint for the lab before you continue.
• It mirrors a real production activity that often appears in troubleshooting tickets.
• Save command output and timestamps so you can compare expected versus actual behavior later.

Step 3: Deploy a test VM and forced-tunnel route table¶

az vm create \
    --resource-group $RG \
    --name vm-egress04 \
    --image Ubuntu2204 \
    --size Standard_B1s \
    --vnet-name vnet-fw-lab04 \
    --subnet workload \
    --admin-username azureuser \
    --generate-ssh-keys \
    --public-ip-address ""

FW_PRIVATE_IP=$(az network firewall ip-config list --resource-group $RG --firewall-name fw-lab04 --query "[0].privateIpAddress" --output tsv)
az network route-table create \
    --resource-group $RG \
    --name rt-workload04 \
    --location $LOCATION

az network route-table route create \
    --resource-group $RG \
    --route-table-name rt-workload04 \
    --name default-to-firewall \
    --address-prefix 0.0.0.0/0 \
    --next-hop-type VirtualAppliance \
    --next-hop-ip-address $FW_PRIVATE_IP

az network vnet subnet update \
    --resource-group $RG \
    --vnet-name vnet-fw-lab04 \
    --name workload \
    --route-table rt-workload04

This is the critical forced-tunneling pattern to validate in later steps.

Why this step matters¶

• It establishes an observable checkpoint for the lab before you continue.
• It mirrors a real production activity that often appears in troubleshooting tickets.
• Save command output and timestamps so you can compare expected versus actual behavior later.

Step 4: Create allow and deny rule collections¶

az network firewall policy rule-collection-group create \
    --resource-group $RG \
    --policy-name fwp-lab04 \
    --name rcg-egress \
    --priority 100

az network firewall policy rule-collection-group collection add-filter-collection \
    --resource-group $RG \
    --policy-name fwp-lab04 \
    --rule-collection-group-name rcg-egress \
    --name allow-web \
    --priority 100 \
    --action Allow

az network firewall policy rule-collection-group collection rule add \
    --resource-group $RG \
    --policy-name fwp-lab04 \
    --rule-collection-group-name rcg-egress \
    --collection-name allow-web \
    --name allow-https \
    --rule-type NetworkRule \
    --ip-protocols TCP \
    --source-addresses 10.140.2.0/24 \
    --destination-addresses 20.42.0.0/16 \
    --destination-ports 443

Adjust the destination to a test target you control, or use an application-rule variant for FQDN-based allowlists.

Why this step matters¶

• It establishes an observable checkpoint for the lab before you continue.
• It mirrors a real production activity that often appears in troubleshooting tickets.
• Save command output and timestamps so you can compare expected versus actual behavior later.

Step 5: Enable diagnostics and inspect evidence¶

az monitor diagnostic-settings create \
    --name send-fw-logs \
    --resource $(az network firewall show --resource-group $RG --name fw-lab04 --query id --output tsv) \
    --workspace $WORKSPACE_ID \
    --logs "[{"category":"AzureFirewallNetworkRule","enabled":true},{"category":"AzureFirewallApplicationRule","enabled":true}]"

az network nic show-effective-route-table \
    --resource-group $RG \
    --name $(az vm show --resource-group $RG --name vm-egress04 --query "networkProfile.networkInterfaces[0].id" --output tsv | awk -F/ '{print $NF}')

The route check proves the workload really sends internet traffic to the firewall, not directly to the internet.

Why this step matters¶

• It establishes an observable checkpoint for the lab before you continue.
• It mirrors a real production activity that often appears in troubleshooting tickets.
• Save command output and timestamps so you can compare expected versus actual behavior later.

Step 6: Test an allow and a deny case¶

az network watcher test-connectivity \
    --resource-group $RG \
    --source-resource $(az vm show --resource-group $RG --name vm-egress04 --query id --output tsv) \
    --dest-address 20.42.10.10 \
    --dest-port 443

az monitor log-analytics query \
    --workspace $WORKSPACE_ID \
    --analytics-query "AzureDiagnostics | where TimeGenerated > ago(30m) | where Category has "AzureFirewall" | project TimeGenerated, action_s, msg_s | order by TimeGenerated desc" \
    --timespan PT30M

The goal is to see both routing evidence and firewall decision evidence in one workflow.

Why this step matters¶

• It establishes an observable checkpoint for the lab before you continue.
• It mirrors a real production activity that often appears in troubleshooting tickets.
• Save command output and timestamps so you can compare expected versus actual behavior later.

Validation Steps¶

• [ ] The workload subnet uses a route table with 0.0.0.0/0 pointing to the firewall private IP.
• [ ] Effective routes on the workload NIC show VirtualAppliance for internet-bound traffic.
• [ ] Firewall diagnostics record allow or deny actions during your tests.
• [ ] You can explain whether a failure was caused by routing, rule logic, or the destination service.

Cleanup Instructions¶

az group delete --name $RG --yes --no-wait

Before cleanup, record any private IPs, route table names, or diagnostic screenshots you want to reuse in troubleshooting notes.

See Also¶

• Nsg And Firewall Best Practices
• Routing Best Practices
• Configure Udr
• Connectivity Failures

Sources¶

• overview
• deploy-cli
• firewall-diagnostics